THE VERSION of LOSS ATOMIC SUBMERSIBLE of "KURSK"
The Author - Oleg Teslenko <C>
Command of the Russian fleet has stated judgement,
that the
crash atomic submersible of "Kursk" has
taken place from
collision with the large buoyant object.
And though some
experimental seamen at once have not agreed with it, but also the
author would like to add the spoon of tar. In first: with "Kursk"
have remained all periscopes antenna are pushed and other
sword
arms is means, that she(it) went on periscope to depth - about 10
meters, and basically its(her) tank could not touch any a vessel,
because the vessels with a settling of 10 meters are simply
too
great and are known all, and usual settling of merchant
vessels
of 6-8 m. Besides as all periscopes were pushed, means
in them
order observation, and hardly would skip a vessel ahead
of the
course. The handle of civil fleet
informs, that as the
militarians produced the doctrines in the given region,
there
basically there could not be no peace vessels at
all - they
beforehand were notified and are remote from that
region, and
atomic submersible of "Kursk" it was simple there is nobody
to
collide. In addition is possible to tell, that submersible
of
this type - extremely large and strong, and at collision is high
probability, what not she(it) would receive damage, and
on the
contrary - vessel adjoined with By it(her). Business
that for
such submersible two tanks: strong internal - with width of
the
metallic plating about 50 mms, and more thin outboard
- with
width not less than 10 mms, that is, in the sum about 60 mms. And
for all peace merchant vessels the width of the plating
hardly
reaches(achieves) 10-15 mms. For whom the plating
is thicker,
that has the large durability, that is at collision will receive
smaller damages. But if "Kursk" from sunk ostensibly from impact,
another means a vessel too should perish! And you see any
peace
vessel has not stated the damages and did not transmit a
signal
"SOS"! To hide corruptings tank of the large size from impact
at
collision in one port it is impossible - as it is necessary
to
reach him(it) still, and to not sink on a road...
Precisely as the supposition of higher grades
of the Russian
naval fleet about collision of "Kursk" with other
submersible
madly looks. If it was Russian, about it it became known a
same
minute. If opposite(on the contrary) - foreign, she(it) could
be
only American. But also it is absolutely impossible. Because
at
such collision, when Russian boat at once sunk, also another
too
should receive strongest hull damages. And at anyone water
any
submarine in The first queue is by all means obliged to emerge in
surface trim, especially American, for which accumulate floating
than for Russian much less. But even having
come in a port
damaged submersible here is obliged to rise on large repair, that
by all means it will be known to all world.
But even more ridiculously initial version of the
naval heads
looked: ostensibly Russian submarine has encountered the old mine
and from its(her) explosion has received fatal damages.
Protest
to this same. Naval polygon for 50 years
after war travel
lengthways and across, and any anchor mine on it(him) basically
be saved could not, yes they within the second
world war on
northern theatre more than year were not
held - ices were
deleted. As "Kursk" went on periscope to depth, when
its(her)
deck from a surface has trimmed about 10 meters, but the
anchor
mine from a surface is held no more than 3 meters
- collision
them it is impossible. And for the ground mine - the depth is too
great: hundred meters. On such depth she(it) will not work,
and
its(her) explosion of a harm will not bring.
******************
There is an alternate version: explosion
ammunition itself
atomic submersible. She(it) was put forward
by(with) some
experimental captains of naval fleet. This version is unpleasant
to the military heads, as at once lays It would be possible
to
shift all fault on the naval orders, whereas in the version about
collision a part of fault on external circumstances on notorious
"enemies". The essence of the version that at
start-up of a
torpedo or missile she(it) has blown up. However, here again
are
available protest. Business that any modern high-power
battle
resource whether it be 533-cross-section torpedo or the
cruise
missile has some degrees of protection from spontaneous operation
- Simply of fuses(safety devices). And the operation of exploder
mechanisms is possible not earlier, than she(it) will pass cable
length from a boat (order two hundred meters). Same and
for a
missile. The device of torpedo tubes is ideally completed - them
is made hundreds pieces, and such troubles as explosion
of a
torpedo in the means for anybody did not happen.
And "Kursk"
torpedo tube shot from repeatedly.
Speak about possibility of explosion gunpowder of
a drive of
a missile. However, a little who knows, that as gunpowders
for
missiles the most slowly shining gunpowder will be
used which
basically can not blow up, and is
capable only to shine.
Absolutely other business, if onboard atomic
submersible of
"Kursk" there were torpedoes by fuel grounded on
perioxide of
hydrogen. This substance is capable spontaneously
to be
decomposed and to blow up. But all the same are necessary
for
this purpose the special conditions:
or fire inside a
submersible, or hole of a fuel bowl of a torpedo. And it already
is improbable. But the main breached from explosion of a torpedo
is rather local - holds the limited region a dia about 8 meters.
And length of a bow torpedo room from a stem up to his(its) after
bulkhead makes approximately two lengths of a torpedo by everyone
till eight meters one torpedo in a torpedo launcher
tube, and
following(next) on a storage rack behind it(him). That is, length
of bow bay is twice more than a diameter of a breached. It means,
that the visible corruptings from torpedo explosion
would owe
will be limited to the first bay, and actually they have captured
the second bay and third, therefore size of deformation
of the
boat plating about forty meters - any torpedo it not under force.
The items of information from the Norwegian
side now have
acted(arrived), that their seismic servers just at the moment
of
a crash have fixed two explosions - first weak, and
second -
strong. Assume, that first there was an explosion
of a small
amount of gas hydrogen, and second is ostensibly explosion
boat
ammunition. But also this judgement the large error.
Business
that after the first explosion water Incoming inside of
a boat
fast has flooded a fore end, and it completely has saved her(it)
of probability of a detonation of
any explosive. If two
explosions in time have merged in one, then it would be possible
to speak about call of the second explosion first. And as between
them there was a period more than second, means detonations
was
not. As all know - water extinguishes a fire, and the combustion
of gunpowder in general can be extinguished(put out)
only by
water: not Apply an inundation of cellars ammunition by
water.
Therefore first explosion on "Kursk" called(caused) a
breached
could not by her(it) call(cause) explosion of an ammunition
in
any way.
*********************
But in opinion of the author, other reason
of loss atomic
submersible of "Kursk" is most probable
absolutely is an
explosion of hydrogen. This dangerous gas is known for all.
The
force of his(its) explosion on kg of a weight is greater than for
TNT. The unique(sole) happiness for the Earth, that hydrogen
is
much easier than air and consequently
it(he) very fast
улетучив ется, not creating explosion-dangerous concentration. It
is necessary to tell, that the hydrogen blows up,
if it(him)
there are more than 4 %. Such mixture of a
small amount of
hydrogen and air is named as "gas hydrogen". At
discovery of
hydrogen the last century one scientist has inhaled it(him),
so
in a mouth there was an insignificant amount - about the
100-th
long of gramme, but anything singular has not
experienced -
neither taste nor smell. And then it(he) has
taken and has
exhaled it(him) on a flame of a candle. The small explosion
was
distributed, recollecting this horror and pain, the
scientist
wrote: "I thought - my cogs turn to a dust!".
In spite of the fact that the submersible
of "Kursk" only
atomic, but on any atomic submarine all the same is
present a
small accumulator battery. And by its(her) operation in size
of
bay all time in small amounts is selected(allocated)
hydrogen.
The version is, that for any reason her(it) burn of hydrogen have
ceased to consult(cope) with arrival of hydrogen, which, however,
was selected(allocated) very little - probably all some
gramme.
However in any bay of a boat there is a set of devices working on
an electrical current, at turn off each of which
is by-passed
though small - by(with) an electrical scintilla, invisible to
a
human eye, as a scintilla in petrol engines, Lighting(sparking)
... mixture. But this time she(it) burned mixture
of air and
hydrogen: "gas of hydrogen". There was an explosion - likely
not
such strong completely into smithereens to deliver all fore
end
of an atomic submersible. This explosion
the Norwegians
value as by force in 1-2 kgs TNT (actually
approximately two
hundred g hydrogen). But his(its) force has sufficed
to swell
Fore end of a submarine, and having torn her(it) on seams to make
some breacheds. Through them in the second bay began
to slash
water, and in tank of this submarine in the second bay, where the
battery places accumulator, some tons of water
have hitted.
She(it) has begun to flow downwards - in a battery well, and
has
sloshed her(it). But from it there was an electroclosing.
The
upper conclusions of storage electrodes have become isolated by a
salt water. And under operation of a potential
difference on
electrodes the seawater here began to
be decomposed to
components: hydrogen and chlorine (selected(allocated)
from
marine salt NaCl). And again from a scintilla has thundered
the
second explosion, but one many times more awful - force up to ton
TNT. And the force of explosion certainly damaged
transverse
bulkheads - Not everything, but down to the fourth - fifth
bay.
That through breacheds the submersible of "Kursk"
was almost
instantly flooding, and the majority
of its(her) crew, is
probable 70 % were in bow bays has perished per one second
from
explosion, and were in intermediate sections an one minute
from
an inundation.
*****************
From explosions of gas hydrogen the set of
submersibles has
perished. Still in 1904 г from an accidentally open manhole
the
small Russian submersible "Dolphin" is direct in
harbour has
sunk. But when her(it) have lifted from 7 meter
depthes, and
began to bail out, there was an explosion
of gas hydrogen
selected(allocated) from accumulator of the battery. Mahlo that -
in 5 hours there was a second explosion, from which four men have
suffered.
After one year also from
an open manhole the English
submarine A-8 has perished. But IN TWO HOURS,
when the boat
already for a long time laid at the bottom - that by the external
spectators the underwater explosion was marked, and the pile
of
water was lifted on height of three meters. Is quoted under
the
book A.A. Narusbaev "Catastrophes in marine depthes" (Leningrad
1989 г): "the Explosions of gas hydrogen happened not
only on
abnormal submersibles as a result of
selection of hydrogen
called(caused) by contact of accumulators with
seawater. The
selection of hydrogen was watched and at charging
accumulator
batteries, that on boats of those times carried on to derivation
of dangerous concentration of gas in an atmosphere of bays
and
explosions. It were French submersible "Algeria",
"Gimnot",
"Disgraces", American: "Octopus", "Stingrey", Italian "Foresail",
has sunk with the command 14 men, and others...
For preventing explosions gas of hydrogen formed
at charging
of accumulator batteries, on boats installed
high capacity
systems of battery cooling, and also special instruments - (cold)
burn of hydrogen, in which the gas, passing through a stratum
of
the catalyst burn and turned to water.
However, accepted measures have
appeared unsufficiently
effective. The explosions gas of hydrogen and fires from time
to
time happen UP. The similar crashes were especially spread in the
first quarter of our (twentieth) century. So in period with 1900
for 1930. On the American submersibles there were 22 explosions
of accumulator batteries. Only for January - April, 1923
as a
result of explosions of gas hydrogen and subsequent to it(him) of
fires has suffered six submersibles of the Japanese fleet.
The heavy crash has taken place on October
9, 1933 on the
English submersible L-26. At charging a bow accumulator
battery
because of bad operation of battery cooling in bay has blown
up
гремучий gas, then on a boat there was a fire... At explosion one
man eleven has perished were heavily burnt... The constructions
of strong and easy tanks of a submersible were seriously damaged.
In 1936 and 1937 from explosions of
accumulator batteries
heavily have suffered the American submersible S-40 and Japanese
I-3. During the second world war as a result of explosion
of a
stern accumulator battery the American submersible has
perished
"Robalo". About destiny "Robalo" it was possible to
learn(find
out) from fillipin partisans, having link with
the American
seamen, who have hitted in captivity. The explosion in
a stern
room of a boat has taken place on July 26 1944 г, when
she(it)
was in two miles from western coast(littoral)
of an island
П л в н. At explosion all crew, except for four men has perished
which were possible managed shores. All four were seized by
the
Japanese police and later have perished in captivity.
After five years, August 25, 1949 during exercise
cruise in
the Greenland sea as a result of two
sequential explosions
hydrogen of gas and arisen then fire has
sunk the American
submersible "Cochino". Seven men have perished, from which
the
six have died of burns...
In 1955 on wharf in San Francisco the submersible
"Pomodone",
one-type with "Robalo" has blown up... In April, 1988 a
strong
fire вспыхнул on a submersible of
naval forces of USA
"Bounefish". A reason it(him) was
of honey funguses -
explosion of gas hydrogen. 22 men have
received wounds and
burns... "
But in opinion of the author, not only these submarines
have
suffered from explosions of storage hydrogen. In a history of
a
undersea fleet there was a set
of catastrophes, when the
submersible without leaving a trace disappeared in
depthes of
oceans and seas. And is probable, that many from them have taken
place on fault of internal explosions. So for example,
anybody
does not know, the American atomic submersible "Scorpion" why has
not returned to a port. Simply hydrophones were fixed a
strong
sound - by(with) the American
experts it(him) have
defined(determined) as a clap(cotton) crash press by
water of
tank submersible, but in opinion of the author most
likely it
there was an explosion of gas hydrogen.
The loss " of a
"Scorpion" has taken place so instantly, that its(her) crew
had
not time(was in time) to give of any distress call - at explosion
it it is simply impossible to have time(be in time). And is exact
as has not given any alarms and
commander of the Russian
submarine "Kursk".